 |
| Jill Stein, Losing With a Kitty |
Not content with drawing pathetic crowds and fewer votes, Jill Stein felt driven to waste millions of dollars on recounts in several traditionally blue states that went red for Trump. Why?
 |
| Jill Stein, Losing With a Clipboard |
Was she trying to enrich the coffers of the dismally losing ticket Green Party? Was she acting as a shill for the Shill-in-Chief, Hillary? Perhaps it was all part of a grand strategy to mobilize the progleft base for activism during the next four years of Trumpism. You know, give all those transgender revolutionaries a cause to fight, "The elections were rigged, man!"
 |
| Jill Stein, Losing on an Escalator |
Irony aside, Stein's dropping out of her attempt to force a statewide recount in Pennsylvania because of "lack of funds." To quote ZeroHedge:
So did Stein really spend all the $6 million-plus she raised or was the decision made to save the scammed millions instead of pressing ahead with a futile unwarranted recount? (or did Soros run out of cash?)
 |
| Jill Stein, Losing on the Sidewalk |
Right on, Stein. Where's all the money?
You are an epic lib loser.
LSP
18 comments:
She looks so very liberal, she could be a bishop from Canada.
I like her. Her and Pat Paulson. They should team up. Well, other than Pat Paulson is dead, but so are Jill's political ambitions.
They would make a great team.
Euripides, a bold call, well made.
Fredd, do you think Jill's just a shill or a true believer who just likes wasting millions? I'm no expert but I'd say a bit of both.
I expect she padded her pockets some, too. That is a lot of money to just lose.
Be safe and you all have a blessed, wet Sunday. :)
She keeps what she does not spend...so it was a good scam on her fellow progs.
Great pictures but where is she losing in a green onesie with a hot chocolate?
On a totally separate note, it came to my attention that a "Blind" looks very much like a safe space. You and your pal aren't colouring in inside there are you? ;)
I think she's probably just another bright opportunist. True believer? No.
I would argue this position as follows: she's spent much of her youth pursuing a medical degree, and she obtained her MD and finished her training at around the age of 27 or 28. Most 'true believers' glom onto their true beliefs much earlier than that.
Once she started making some serious moolah, she looked around to see how she could maximize her bank account. Working day and night as an MD was too much effort, and I think her ego was such that she liked climbing up on stumps with bullhorns in hand. Once the flash bulbs started popping, things jelled for Jill. Grabbing cans of spray paint and defacing bulldozers is way more lucrative than dealing with scalpels and sutures.
And now this re-count thing has the money flowing into her coffers. Jill's hit the mother lode, Pastor. True believer? Uh uh. Leftist grifter? More likely.
All about rain these days, Linda. It's like Wales, in July.
And Soros has plenty of cash to sling around, LL...
Good call, Jules! The blind is a very safe space, with guns.
Not only is she a loser, but she's a loser who owns only one necklace. Maybe the few extra millions she scammed from her fellow libtards will fund a new necklace. We can only wonder and wait.
Leftist grifter? Good call, Fredd.
That's a very good point, Adrienne, and an ugly one at that. Will she buy something nice? Let's see.
She was just on interviewed today by Chris Wallace (who, amazingly, sliced her a new one) and, guess what? - Yeah, she was wearing that same necklace.
She loves that unpleasant necklace, Adrienne. It's like a talisman for her, but look what awesome luck it's brought her.
Hmm. She's given me an idea! Recount! Sent me money so we can have a recount! I'll use your money for, er, a recount. Totally not spend it on myself. So, to recap, send me money now for...recount!
Infidel, BIG drinks all 'round.
Post a Comment