Are you sick of desperate libs trying to blame their epic election fail on "Russian hacking," as opposed to their own skulduggery, corruption, malfeasance and general lack of appeal? As in, running a millionaire shrill witch for President, along with her associated Satanists and hangers on.
I am and you may be too, but the New York Times isn't. Here's ZeroHedge's take on so-called Russian "hacking":
Someone delivers exact copies of emails written by Democratic Party mandarins into the public record. These messages are subsequently posted online. Thank you WikiLeaks!
Several email threads demonstrate that the Democratic National Committee (DNC) secretly ganged up on Bernie Sanders to undermine his campaign.
Hillary Clinton, who made over a hundred million in speaking fees with her husband, furtively reassures American oligarchs that her “private position” on economic issues won’t threaten their bottom line. In one related email which highlights big money in politics, a wealthy donor jokes “I guess it takes a study to point out the obvious.”
Voters learn that the DNC leveraged its extensive contacts with the media to manipulate coverage in an effort to elevate Trump. The DNC’s strategy document includes a list of Republican “Pied Pipers” which the media was told to “take seriously.”
The Democratic elites become desperate. Rather than accept their party’s role in Trump’s victory and their betrayal of the working class, they decide to blame Russian Hackers.
The Washington Post hyperventilates about Russian Hackers “penetrating” a utility in Vermont. The headline is exposed as a shameless distortion.
Thanks for that, ZeroHedge, right on the money.
Your Pal,
LSP
