Have you watched Tucker taking down lib Australian journo Kat Wong, AP, go figure, at the Australian Freedom Conference in Canberra? Here's a snapshot:
WOW: Liberal journalist calls Tucker racist and accuses him of inspiring mass shootings. pic.twitter.com/mOpFjrwAKP
— Tucker Carlson Network (@TCNetwork) June 26, 2024
Wow. Apart from zeroing in on Wong's stupid, deceitful, condescending, superior, holier-than-thou, risible, narrative hack pretense at journalism, Tucker goes one further. He calls out the West's demographic suicide, and that's exactly what it is, we're not reproducing at replacement rate.
This, per Tucker, is "immoral." He goes on to say that free people can defend themselves, which is to me stunningly commonsensicle. But perhaps you disagree. If so, ask a Red Indian.
In related news, there's some kind of debate this evening between the Doped Up Old Crook and El Senor 45. I'm in two minds, should I watch this thing, hosted by the mendacity that is CNN, or should I not? In other words, should I stay for the debate or should I go?
#2A Forever,
LSP
7 comments:
The man is formidable and unafraid to speak truth to…excuse me…morons. Watched the entire video last night, reminded me of Jordan Peterson doing take downs with logic and facts…similar to Churchill’s famous retort to Lady Astor. Epic.
Well, if Tucker won’t say it, I will. Not only is the “great replacement” real, it most definitely IS specifically anti-white.
I’m going to assume, from the surname and a photo of her, that Kat Wong is of Chinese ancestry. Speaking as a person of Chinese ancestry, she’s not merely acting like an ass, but an ass who’s not nearly as clever as she thinks she is. I have zero sense of group identity with Kat Wong, but if I did, I’d be embarrassed by her.
If I cared enough “to do something” then I could denounce her (as if anyone cares). Or I could accuse Tucker of anti-Sinotism. Circle the wagons out of paranoia and the eternal need to be persecuted. It’d be fascinating to see if the Chinese could make the latter strategy work for them.
Trump does it better, yet they would label him mean despite they were ones asking the stupid question…that clip where he’s walking along a line of reporters, taking questions. This one reporterette - out of frame - asks him something. He pauses, then says, “That’s a stupid question. Why would you ask such a stupid question? You always ask stupid questions.” Then keeps going ignoring her. Just because people interfere in ones life in moronic ways does not mean we have to entertain their idiocy, the caveat being of they directly affect your life then they need putting in their place, and not always politely. May then define you as mean…but so be it. Brood of Vipers wasn’t nice, but it was necessary in the moment.
Wifey and I did our part to avoid demographic suicide.
Well done, DOS, so did my parents and, curiously, my daughter-in-law. (5 kids! Catholic, btw)
Paul, these vipers need to be called out and vilified for the Ivy League, Maoist rainbow corporate hacks they are.
So.
Ah, Mike_C, are you suggesting Kat's educated beyond her intelligence? There's most definitely a lot of that around.
How long, do you think, would the bourgeois Wongite Press last come the revolution? Maybe nothing, maybe Kat will be embraced by our new rainbow corporate proletariat. Your call.
Post a Comment