This is the leader of the worldwide Anglican Non-Communion (WANC), Archbishop of Canterbury Justsin Welby. It would be uncharitable to say that Welby brokered womxn bishop figures into the Church of England and is no longer able to touch the Sacrament with his hands. So I won't say it, but he's clearly afraid of something, unlike these nurses, have a look:
They’re not allowed to tell us it’s all bullshit. They’re showing us instead.. pic.twitter.com/Wlx90PIMX1
— Peep’s Troll 🇺🇸 (@peoples_troll) January 3, 2021
As you can see, these medical professionals are clearly overwhelmed by the catastrophic pandemic which has swept through the Sceptered Isle. Or are they sending a message? Speaking of which, the CDC is telling us some 300,000 in the US people died of the China Virus in 2020, around 0.1% of the populace.
A tragedy, but worth shutting the country down for? Well yes, if it'll help you win an election and get rid of the hated Orange Man. After all, that Chinese cash doesn't come for free you know; the Mandarins expect a healthy return on their investment. And the point of this short evening homily?
Their ruler is the Father of Lies and a murderer from the beginning. But remember, he has been defeated and his days numbered. Take heart in that and pray for angelic protection in the day of battle and the powerful intercession of Our Lady, whose offspring crushes the serpent's head underheel.
Here endeth the Lesson,
LSP
...but if the shutdown of America saves just one life?
ReplyDeleteWANC has become sort of a parody - kabuki theater. Sad, really.
Parson, who is the angel with the sword?
ReplyDeleteLooks like the type I'd want on our side....
LL, the Guardian/NYT at prayer.
ReplyDeleteAs for life, hasn't Pelosi just been reelected as Speaker? Sad, all the way to the bank. Speaking of kabuki.
That'd be the Archangel Michael, drjim.
ReplyDeleteDefende nos.
I had an inkling that's who it is. Very appropriate!
ReplyDeleteKabuki Theater in a Potempkin Village these days.
ReplyDeleteRegarding Old Scratch and his minions: there is great comfort in reading the back of the book first - whilst not ignoring the rest of it, of course. Spoiler alert: we win, they loose.
I'm not a doctrinal expert or a theologian, buuuut is that even a valid consecration? Maybe valid, but illicit?
ReplyDeleteIf nothing else it sure sends the wrong message!!!