ZeroHedge -- As is by now well-known, the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency’s previously classified 2012 report on the origin of the Islamic insurgency against Bashar al-Assad was released to the public on 18 May 2015, and it revealed the Obama Administration’s knowledge, at least since that time, that «the Salafist [Saudi-backed fundamentalist Sunni Islamic], the Muslim Brotherhood [Qatari-backed fundamentalist Sunni Islamic] and AQI [Al Qaeda in Iraq] are the major forces driving the insurgency in Syria», and acknowledgement that «the West, Gulf countries [Saudi Arabia and Qatar mainly], and Turkey support the opposition [to Bashar al-Assad], while Russia, China, and Iran support the regime», so that the U.S. Government is, in fact, allied with Al Qaeda there, to overthrow Assad.
This pro-Al-Qaeda position was news, however, to America’s military personnel in that region.
Reflect on the NWO skulguggery, malfeasance and outright perfidy of our globalist elitocracy and ask yourself how happy you'd be, defending our Jihad frenemies under the command of Barack Obama and his chosen Illuminati puppet successor, Hillary. Maybe not so much.
I'm off to clean an AR.
Kick out the JAMS.
LSP
"This pro-Al-Qaeda position was news, however, to America’s military personnel in that region."
ReplyDeleteI think that I blogged about the fact that we were allied with Al Qaeda in Syria a year ago. It wasn't a secret to people who had an understanding of the ObamaNation's choice of allies. If you are allied with Saudi Arabian interests you are defacto allied with Al Qaeda and the Wahabbists. The Saudis paid for Obama and Hillary and wanted their cat's paws to do their bidding in Syria, which we've done -- poorly, because America is incompetent these days as the fish rots from the head down.
This goes back much further, taking one back to Fahrenheit 911 territory - why did George Bush and his administration let Bin Laden's family leave the USA immediately after the 9/11 attacks? And why then why did America launch an attack Iraq - a country which like Vietnam did not attack the USA - and which was the enemy of Al Qaeda? 'Tis a part, we see not a whole...
ReplyDeleteYou lot seemed to get jolly miffed with Benedict Arnold taking the King's Shilling. Why is it different when you take the coin of another King?
ReplyDeleteI admit to being woefully unable to keep all the players in this international spectacle properly sorted out. I rely on if it's something Hillary or Odumbo wants or does -then it's wrong. It's been working well.
ReplyDeleteI think Adrienne has a foolproof test there. It's hard to argue with a 100% record.
ReplyDeleteWe were all blogging about it, LL, but the story never really got any traction. Even today, when our military/financial support for Al Qaeda is open, people don't seem to care. And then there's our out of hand proxy army, ISIS. Why haven't we taken out the head choppers by now? Oh yeah, rotten fish all the way down.
ReplyDeleteAlright there, Anonymous. I remember taking the King's Shilling and thinking it didn't get me very far but regardless, good F911 point. Burn those books! Of course that's not necessary these days because no one reads. I guess GWB and everyone else after him are part of that, see "religion of peace."
ReplyDeleteKick out the JAMS.
Adrienne, Grunt, I agree.
ReplyDeleteIt's Farenheight 415 if you want to burn books. Actually, it should be 440 °F to 470 °F, but 415 is a good start.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Adrienne. F451 -- now I remember... I obviously need to read more!
ReplyDelete