Wednesday, October 19, 2016

The Last Debate



There were no flies on Hillary tonight, as she defended partial birth abortion and accused WikiLeaks, and presumably Julian Assange, of being Russian saboteurs.

Really, the Podesta emails are a Russian plot? As one commentator put it, "So the Russians hacked their emails, but what's in them?" Nothing good for the Clinton campaign, which is perhaps why Hillary seemed off-balance at this debate, often stumbling in her delivery and resorting to endless ad hominem attacks on Donald Trump. Sure, smug blasts of shrill maybe one form of attack, but it didn't sound good.

Unlike Hillary's self-assured "strong defense of borders" delivery, which sounded great until she was asked by the moderator to explain her  leaked speech to Brazilian bankers stating, “My dream is a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders.” That sounded bad, as if, sink me, she was a liar. 

Hillary tried to explain that away by referring to bankers and the movement of money, or something. Whatever, it sounded weak, and that's just it.

Hillary sounded shrill and lame tonight and Trump sounded more assured and on top of the debate than he's done so far. Perhaps that's not saying much, but there it is. Not so much the mad bomber as the less-orange-than-he-used-to-be President in waiting and a man who wants to reverse the hollowing out of America. 

Face it, let's get jobs and industry back resonates.

Hillary pretty much began the debate by defending partial birth abortion and concluded by telling the world that she was the champion of children. 

The flies were obviously invisible.

LSP





8 comments:

  1. She was not in good shape physically either. Her right eye was going wonky, her gait was unsteady, and her hands often displayed signs of Parkinson.

    Shrill? Goodness yes! And her ugly little pinched mouth, which could be partially attributed to Parkinson.

    ReplyDelete
  2. And let's not forget the creepy smile...

    ReplyDelete
  3. The moderator wasn't her ally in this debate. I think that made all the difference.

    In the previous debates it went like this:

    CNN Superstar: Mr. Trump, when did you stop beating your wife?

    MSNBC Shill: Mrs. Clinton, where did you go on vacation last year and which restaurant had the best sommelier?

    ReplyDelete
  4. The only point I caught was the Second Amendment debate, where she claims she's like *most Americans* in wanting "common sense" gun laws and to close the gun show and online "loopholes." Any time I hear some liberal politician spout off those talking points, I just want to shake them like a terrier with a rat!

    ReplyDelete
  5. I haven't had the pleasure of watching this one yet. I was forced to go out and drink Champagne last night. I now have to clear my head and negate the nauseous feeling in my stomach with some Weetabix before I go look at Hillary. Thanks for the heads up on here though.

    ReplyDelete
  6. LL, I thought Matthews did a pretty good job unlike, say Radaatz.

    ReplyDelete
  7. "Terrier with a rat," I like that, Mattexian.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Haven't had Weetabix in ages, Jules. Nice.

    ReplyDelete